Why Did Phil Beat Tiger ?
Ummm, because he’s a better putter ? Or at least he was on Monday.
I captured that graphic while I watched the coverage of the 16th hole on PGATour.com, which is the only way I could see any of Monday’s round.
BUT, and this is a big but, Tiger’s gonna be hard to handle at Cog Hill.
In Illinois, in big events, he’s REALLY, REALLY hard to beat.
Look it up.
Write it down.
Count on it.
Related posts:
- Woody’s Right About Tiger And The Media I watched the entire last round of the PGA Championship....
- The LPGA Chooses To Exclude Bloggers My golf blog buddy over at The Deep Rough has...
- Congrats To Phil Mickelson Phil Mickelson has captured another Major title and our hat...
- Maybe Next Year I’ll Get To Watch The Deutsche Bank Championship I'm not going to complain about the Jerry Lewis Labor...
- Phil Mickelson & Vince Gill - Never Seen Together ? Does anybody remember seeing Phil Mickelson and Vince Gill...
{ 2 comments… read them below or add one }
Interesting how when Tiger loses people are quick to make excuses for him.
“He didn’t putt well. If he makes a few of those putts, he wins by five.”
True enough.
But when the guys chasing Tiger miss putts, they choke. (They probably do.)
My point: I find it a little distasteful when Phil (or anybody else) closes with a win over Tiger and then it’s diminished because Tiger didn’t play his best.
I say give them full credit. Golf would be more interesting if it happened more often.
I absolutely agree.
Same thing happens to the Yankees.
Leave a Comment