<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:rawvoice="http://www.rawvoice.com/rawvoiceRssModule/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Not Much Excitement In The 2007 Masters</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.travellinggolfer.com/not-much-excitement-in-the-2007-masters/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.travellinggolfer.com/not-much-excitement-in-the-2007-masters/</link>
	<description>Golf Courses, Golf Vacations, Golf Instruction, Golf News and More ...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 May 2011 22:51:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Sigers</title>
		<link>http://www.travellinggolfer.com/not-much-excitement-in-the-2007-masters/comment-page-1/#comment-24216</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Sigers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Apr 2007 14:27:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://travellinggolfer.com/not-much-excitement-in-the-2007-masters/#comment-24216</guid>
		<description>There&#039;s a lot of other people who feel the same as you Nick.

I&#039;m just used to Sunday charges and exciting back nines at Augusta.

The &quot;par is a great score&quot; thang is usually reserved for The U.S. Open, where we&#039;re used to this type of play.

Augusta&#039;s greens were never meant to be 12+ on the Stimpmeter. When they were designed, with all that slope, the greens were good at around 6 or 7, if a Stimpmeter had been invented back then.

You, nor I, not a LOT of the Pro&#039;s, would or will not enjoy golf when Par is a &#039;great&#039; score.

A &#039;great&#039; score should be birdie, a &#039;good&#039; score should be par.

Golf was never meant to be a mentally exhausting test of survival.

Look back in the anals (there&#039;s that word again) of golf at the courses and people who began the game and you&#039;ll see that &#039;Target&#039; golf is a purely Americanized version made for advertisers and developers.

The Open Championship (British Open) is by far the best test of &#039;golf&#039; and probably always will be.

I don&#039;t like those -26 after 4 days golf tournaments either, but I also don&#039;t think a course setup that causes the 70 best golfers in the world to shoot over par is a very good setup either.

Augusta National is just doing this because they can and they know not many will complain or they&#039;ll take their toys and not let you play with them.

They have more than one problem down there and this is just the part we see.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There&#8217;s a lot of other people who feel the same as you Nick.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m just used to Sunday charges and exciting back nines at Augusta.</p>
<p>The &#8220;par is a great score&#8221; thang is usually reserved for The U.S. Open, where we&#8217;re used to this type of play.</p>
<p>Augusta&#8217;s greens were never meant to be 12+ on the Stimpmeter. When they were designed, with all that slope, the greens were good at around 6 or 7, if a Stimpmeter had been invented back then.</p>
<p>You, nor I, not a LOT of the Pro&#8217;s, would or will not enjoy golf when Par is a &#8216;great&#8217; score.</p>
<p>A &#8216;great&#8217; score should be birdie, a &#8216;good&#8217; score should be par.</p>
<p>Golf was never meant to be a mentally exhausting test of survival.</p>
<p>Look back in the anals (there&#8217;s that word again) of golf at the courses and people who began the game and you&#8217;ll see that &#8216;Target&#8217; golf is a purely Americanized version made for advertisers and developers.</p>
<p>The Open Championship (British Open) is by far the best test of &#8216;golf&#8217; and probably always will be.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t like those -26 after 4 days golf tournaments either, but I also don&#8217;t think a course setup that causes the 70 best golfers in the world to shoot over par is a very good setup either.</p>
<p>Augusta National is just doing this because they can and they know not many will complain or they&#8217;ll take their toys and not let you play with them.</p>
<p>They have more than one problem down there and this is just the part we see.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick</title>
		<link>http://www.travellinggolfer.com/not-much-excitement-in-the-2007-masters/comment-page-1/#comment-24215</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Apr 2007 13:44:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://travellinggolfer.com/not-much-excitement-in-the-2007-masters/#comment-24215</guid>
		<description>I think it&#039;s great to watch a tournament where par actually means something. It makes us normal hackers feel a little better about our games to see the pros struggling a bit instead of shooting bogey free rounds of 63, 64, etc. I wish we saw this type of golf more often!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it&#8217;s great to watch a tournament where par actually means something. It makes us normal hackers feel a little better about our games to see the pros struggling a bit instead of shooting bogey free rounds of 63, 64, etc. I wish we saw this type of golf more often!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

