<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:rawvoice="http://www.rawvoice.com/rawvoiceRssModule/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: I Need A New 3-Wood</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.travellinggolfer.com/i-need-a-new-3-wood/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.travellinggolfer.com/i-need-a-new-3-wood/</link>
	<description>Golf Courses, Golf Vacations, Golf Instruction, Golf News and More ...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 May 2011 22:51:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kev</title>
		<link>http://www.travellinggolfer.com/i-need-a-new-3-wood/comment-page-1/#comment-153798</link>
		<dc:creator>Kev</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2009 12:46:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.travellinggolfer.com/?p=583#comment-153798</guid>
		<description>I havn&#039;t used a 3 wood for a while now (have a Driver and a 5-wood, seems to work well for me), but i used to use an Adams Tight Lies.  This was back in the days when fairway woods were still a new thing.  Sometimes I would get the cleanest, most effortless, most beautiful shot from that thing.

The biggest problem I had with the fairway wood was that I couldn\&#039;t hit it off the tee very well.  It sounds to me like you want to be in more fairways, and so you&#039;ll be wanting more control off the tee.  In this case I would suggest a more traditional 3-wood rather than a fairway wood.  Something with a bigger face and easier to hit the sweet spot when teed up.  Then you should find yourself in more fairways.

Besides if you&#039;re in the fairway, it&#039;s not hard to hit a traditional 3-wood from the ground anyway (with some practice).  So you&#039;ll still be able to &#039;go for it&#039; on the par 5s!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I havn&#8217;t used a 3 wood for a while now (have a Driver and a 5-wood, seems to work well for me), but i used to use an Adams Tight Lies.  This was back in the days when fairway woods were still a new thing.  Sometimes I would get the cleanest, most effortless, most beautiful shot from that thing.</p>
<p>The biggest problem I had with the fairway wood was that I couldn\&#8217;t hit it off the tee very well.  It sounds to me like you want to be in more fairways, and so you&#8217;ll be wanting more control off the tee.  In this case I would suggest a more traditional 3-wood rather than a fairway wood.  Something with a bigger face and easier to hit the sweet spot when teed up.  Then you should find yourself in more fairways.</p>
<p>Besides if you&#8217;re in the fairway, it&#8217;s not hard to hit a traditional 3-wood from the ground anyway (with some practice).  So you&#8217;ll still be able to &#8216;go for it&#8217; on the par 5s!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

