<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:rawvoice="http://www.rawvoice.com/rawvoiceRssModule/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Cavity Back Irons &#8211; Pros And Cons</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.travellinggolfer.com/cavity-back-irons-pros-and-cons/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.travellinggolfer.com/cavity-back-irons-pros-and-cons/</link>
	<description>Golf Courses, Golf Vacations, Golf Instruction, Golf News and More ...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 May 2011 22:51:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Sigers</title>
		<link>http://www.travellinggolfer.com/cavity-back-irons-pros-and-cons/comment-page-1/#comment-24236</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Sigers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Apr 2007 12:59:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://travellinggolfer.com/?p=203#comment-24236</guid>
		<description>Hey Rob,

What&#039;s a fruit tree got to do with golf ;-)

Thanks for stopping by.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Rob,</p>
<p>What&#8217;s a fruit tree got to do with golf <img src='http://www.travellinggolfer.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Thanks for stopping by.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob Edwards</title>
		<link>http://www.travellinggolfer.com/cavity-back-irons-pros-and-cons/comment-page-1/#comment-24235</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob Edwards</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Apr 2007 10:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://travellinggolfer.com/?p=203#comment-24235</guid>
		<description>I could not agree more with Mike McEvoy - I am pleased to be among the smiling minority who know how it truly feels to pure a blade.

Now, what about Persimmon?

Real golf.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I could not agree more with Mike McEvoy &#8211; I am pleased to be among the smiling minority who know how it truly feels to pure a blade.</p>
<p>Now, what about Persimmon?</p>
<p>Real golf.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Sigers</title>
		<link>http://www.travellinggolfer.com/cavity-back-irons-pros-and-cons/comment-page-1/#comment-24220</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Sigers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Apr 2007 16:52:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://travellinggolfer.com/?p=203#comment-24220</guid>
		<description>Thanks Mike !

Great addition to the post.

Stop by again soon.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Mike !</p>
<p>Great addition to the post.</p>
<p>Stop by again soon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike McEvoy</title>
		<link>http://www.travellinggolfer.com/cavity-back-irons-pros-and-cons/comment-page-1/#comment-24219</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike McEvoy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Apr 2007 22:55:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://travellinggolfer.com/?p=203#comment-24219</guid>
		<description>The truth is, there isn&#039;t such a big difference between a blade and a cavity back iron. 

Maybe if you want to compare those two styles against a new full-hybrid set, some major differences would appear. But, for me (and I regularly shoot in the mid-90&#039;s), blades are BETTER. 

For one thing, they are just prettier. They aren&#039;t huge and chunky. They don&#039;t have all sorts of &quot;technology&quot; hanging on the backs of the faces. (I think face back inserts are UGLY!)

Plus, they help me improve by telling me WHY my swing was bad. 

It didn&#039;t take me long (less than 1 month) to adjust to the &quot;tougher&quot; iron style. 

I am very skeptical whether &quot;game improvement&quot; irons actually create a significantly larger sweet spot anyway. 

I could hit really bad shots with my Ping G5 clones, too.

One final note: Hitting a pure shot with a blade feels so awesome!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The truth is, there isn&#8217;t such a big difference between a blade and a cavity back iron. </p>
<p>Maybe if you want to compare those two styles against a new full-hybrid set, some major differences would appear. But, for me (and I regularly shoot in the mid-90&#8242;s), blades are BETTER. </p>
<p>For one thing, they are just prettier. They aren&#8217;t huge and chunky. They don&#8217;t have all sorts of &#8220;technology&#8221; hanging on the backs of the faces. (I think face back inserts are UGLY!)</p>
<p>Plus, they help me improve by telling me WHY my swing was bad. </p>
<p>It didn&#8217;t take me long (less than 1 month) to adjust to the &#8220;tougher&#8221; iron style. </p>
<p>I am very skeptical whether &#8220;game improvement&#8221; irons actually create a significantly larger sweet spot anyway. </p>
<p>I could hit really bad shots with my Ping G5 clones, too.</p>
<p>One final note: Hitting a pure shot with a blade feels so awesome!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Sigers</title>
		<link>http://www.travellinggolfer.com/cavity-back-irons-pros-and-cons/comment-page-1/#comment-8214</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Sigers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Nov 2006 03:09:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://travellinggolfer.com/?p=203#comment-8214</guid>
		<description>Uh ... no.

If I had to hit blades, I&#039;d quit ... and I&#039;m a 7 handicap or less, depending on my back and how much it lets me play.

If they could swing properly, they wouldn&#039;t be high handicappers, Stankfish.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Uh &#8230; no.</p>
<p>If I had to hit blades, I&#8217;d quit &#8230; and I&#8217;m a 7 handicap or less, depending on my back and how much it lets me play.</p>
<p>If they could swing properly, they wouldn&#8217;t be high handicappers, Stankfish.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stankyfish</title>
		<link>http://www.travellinggolfer.com/cavity-back-irons-pros-and-cons/comment-page-1/#comment-8202</link>
		<dc:creator>Stankyfish</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Nov 2006 23:21:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://travellinggolfer.com/?p=203#comment-8202</guid>
		<description>What about the argument that cavity backs reinforce bad swinging habits for high handicappers BECAUSE they are more forgiving?

Doesn&#039;t learning to hit a blade teach a high handicapper that swinging properly is better than just grip and rip?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What about the argument that cavity backs reinforce bad swinging habits for high handicappers BECAUSE they are more forgiving?</p>
<p>Doesn&#8217;t learning to hit a blade teach a high handicapper that swinging properly is better than just grip and rip?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Sigers</title>
		<link>http://www.travellinggolfer.com/cavity-back-irons-pros-and-cons/comment-page-1/#comment-4239</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Sigers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Jul 2006 23:11:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://travellinggolfer.com/?p=203#comment-4239</guid>
		<description>You&#039;re welcome John.

Good luck with your choice !</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;re welcome John.</p>
<p>Good luck with your choice !</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Luna</title>
		<link>http://www.travellinggolfer.com/cavity-back-irons-pros-and-cons/comment-page-1/#comment-4233</link>
		<dc:creator>John Luna</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Jul 2006 18:21:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://travellinggolfer.com/?p=203#comment-4233</guid>
		<description>Thanks for this great article on cavity back irons! I&#039;m an average golfer (90-95) and have tried a friend&#039;s Callaway cavity irons and reall liked them. It seems I have made better shots with his irons. I was thinking of looking for a used set to buy. Now that I&#039;ve read your article, I&#039;m sure I&#039;m going to to do it!
Thanks again!
John Luna</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for this great article on cavity back irons! I&#8217;m an average golfer (90-95) and have tried a friend&#8217;s Callaway cavity irons and reall liked them. It seems I have made better shots with his irons. I was thinking of looking for a used set to buy. Now that I&#8217;ve read your article, I&#8217;m sure I&#8217;m going to to do it!<br />
Thanks again!<br />
John Luna</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Travelling Golfer &#187; Top 5 Posts From Travelling Golfer</title>
		<link>http://www.travellinggolfer.com/cavity-back-irons-pros-and-cons/comment-page-1/#comment-3962</link>
		<dc:creator>Travelling Golfer &#187; Top 5 Posts From Travelling Golfer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Jul 2006 16:46:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://travellinggolfer.com/?p=203#comment-3962</guid>
		<description>[...] 2) Likewise, this post about the pros and cons of cavity back irons is very popular. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 2) Likewise, this post about the pros and cons of cavity back irons is very popular. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dave</title>
		<link>http://www.travellinggolfer.com/cavity-back-irons-pros-and-cons/comment-page-1/#comment-561</link>
		<dc:creator>dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Apr 2006 12:00:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://travellinggolfer.com/?p=203#comment-561</guid>
		<description>I was pleased to read about the two types of irons. My son plays blades and I have always wondered what the difference really was.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was pleased to read about the two types of irons. My son plays blades and I have always wondered what the difference really was.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

