Cavity Back Irons – Pros And Cons

by Mike

How To Break 80

Today I read a fine post from our friend Jack Moorehouse, the author of How To Break 80 … And Shoot Like The Pros. He addresses the age old problem of blades versus cavity back irons. I personally don’t even think about blades anymore. I’m playing a set of irons from the old Palmer line. They were reworked by Peerless after they bought the Patented Hosel Design technology and the heads were sold/given to me by a friend from National Golf Suppliers from Louisville. Each head is cavity weighted differently, to help each individual head square up at impact. I put true Temper TX-90 shafts in and I use only Tour Velvet grips on all my clubs.

Now let’s check out Jack’s thoughts on the subject :

Whenever I talk about irons in my golf lessons, students invariably ask which style is best—cavity back or blade. The cavity back has its advantages and its disadvantages. It also has its fans.

Golfers, however, shouldn’t choose an iron style because it’s popular in the clubhouse, since the style many not fit their game. The key to iron styles, as I’ve said in my golf tips, is finding what’s right for you.

Cavity backs are popular these days—and for good reason. A cavity back has a small amount of metal removed from the back of its clubface, producing a small hole. Removing the metal re-distributes the clubhead’s weight around the edges of the clubface, father away from the center of gravity (COG).

Re-positioning the COG creates a much more forgiving iron, with a larger sweet spot along the blade. Thus, a mis-hit with a cavity back is more likely to stay on target than a similar shot with a blade. Why? Because the cavity back twists less in a player’s hand when the ball is mis-hit. A mis-hit with a cavity back is also more likely to travel farther than with a blade.

Cavity backs are “game improvement’’ clubs, offering special features that help golfers play better, like an oversize head. I’ve talked about these clubs in my golf tips. Players with high and mid golf handicaps prefer cavity backs, although some low handicappers and touring pros use them.

Blade irons are not as popular as cavity backs. A blade iron features a solid clubface back, distributing the weight more evenly across the clubface, closer to the clubhead’s COG. Thus, a blade has a much smaller sweet spot than a cavity back. A blade is also much less forgiving than a cavity back because it twists more in a player’s hands on mis-hits.

Distributing the weight evenly across the clubface, however, creates an iron with better control and more feel. These irons need to be hit nearly perfectly, though, to avoid a bad shot. Thus, it takes a lot of practice and experience to hit these irons well, something I work on in my golf lessons with low handicappers.

The blade iron is known as a more traditional iron because it lacks the cavity back’s special game improvement features. Players with low golf handicaps and touring pros prefer the blade style iron because the added control and feel enables them to shape their shots better—a necessity when playing on challenging courses.

Manufacturers make cavity backs and blades in cast and forged versions. The terms “cast” and “forged” refer to the manufacturing process used to form the iron head’s shape.

Casting turns the metal from which the iron head is made into a molten liquid, which is then poured into a mold to form the iron head. It’s then left to cool.

Forging involves pounding or compressing the metal, in it’s solid form, from which the iron head is made into the desired shape. Other machining and drilling steps complete production.

The manufacturing process has no impact on the iron’s capabilities, as I’ve explained in previous golf tips. If you have two irons, one forged and one cast, of exactly the same shape, with the same center of gravity, same loft, same grip, hitting the same ball, and so on, the shots will travel the same distances 99 percent of the time. And the players won’t know which iron head is cast and which forged.

You need to find the iron style that best fits your game, as I point out in my golf instruction. If you’re a less experienced golfer, the cavity back is probably a wiser choice, since you’re more likely to mis-hit a ball. If you’re a more experienced player, then a blade is probably your best choice, since it provides more control and better feel for shaping shots.

The best way of choosing a style that fits your needs is to test it out. Hit a few balls with each style. If one style feels better than another does, and you have confidence in it, that’s the style that’s right for you.

Jack Moorehouse is the author of the best-selling book “How To Break 80 And Shoot Like The Pros.” He is NOT a golf pro, rather a working man that has helped thousands of golfers from all seven continents lower their handicap immediately. He has a free weekly newsletter with the latest golf tips, golf lessons and golf instruction.

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...

{ 9 comments… read them below or add one }

dave April 5, 2006 at 7:00 am

I was pleased to read about the two types of irons. My son plays blades and I have always wondered what the difference really was.

John Luna July 25, 2006 at 1:21 pm

Thanks for this great article on cavity back irons! I’m an average golfer (90-95) and have tried a friend’s Callaway cavity irons and reall liked them. It seems I have made better shots with his irons. I was thinking of looking for a used set to buy. Now that I’ve read your article, I’m sure I’m going to to do it!
Thanks again!
John Luna

Mike Sigers July 25, 2006 at 6:11 pm

You’re welcome John.

Good luck with your choice !

Stankyfish November 5, 2006 at 6:21 pm

What about the argument that cavity backs reinforce bad swinging habits for high handicappers BECAUSE they are more forgiving?

Doesn’t learning to hit a blade teach a high handicapper that swinging properly is better than just grip and rip?

Mike Sigers November 5, 2006 at 10:09 pm

Uh … no.

If I had to hit blades, I’d quit … and I’m a 7 handicap or less, depending on my back and how much it lets me play.

If they could swing properly, they wouldn’t be high handicappers, Stankfish.

Mike McEvoy April 14, 2007 at 5:55 pm

The truth is, there isn’t such a big difference between a blade and a cavity back iron.

Maybe if you want to compare those two styles against a new full-hybrid set, some major differences would appear. But, for me (and I regularly shoot in the mid-90′s), blades are BETTER.

For one thing, they are just prettier. They aren’t huge and chunky. They don’t have all sorts of “technology” hanging on the backs of the faces. (I think face back inserts are UGLY!)

Plus, they help me improve by telling me WHY my swing was bad.

It didn’t take me long (less than 1 month) to adjust to the “tougher” iron style.

I am very skeptical whether “game improvement” irons actually create a significantly larger sweet spot anyway.

I could hit really bad shots with my Ping G5 clones, too.

One final note: Hitting a pure shot with a blade feels so awesome!

Mike Sigers April 15, 2007 at 11:52 am

Thanks Mike !

Great addition to the post.

Stop by again soon.

Rob Edwards April 30, 2007 at 5:50 am

I could not agree more with Mike McEvoy – I am pleased to be among the smiling minority who know how it truly feels to pure a blade.

Now, what about Persimmon?

Real golf.

Mike Sigers April 30, 2007 at 7:59 am

Hey Rob,

What’s a fruit tree got to do with golf ;-)

Thanks for stopping by.

Leave a Comment

*
To prove you're a person (not a spam script), type the security word shown in the picture. Click on the picture to hear an audio file of the word.
Anti-spam image

{ 1 trackback }